The Pros And Cons Of Mass Shootings - 1462 Words

The First Amendment of the Constitution says that the Congress cannot make a law that forces people to follow one religion or prohibit free speech. It also says that people have the right to hold peaceful assemblies to make a change. This allows people to have opinions and express them freely as long as they are peaceful. The article connects to the First Amendment because the NFL players are protesting what they believe in and using freedom of speech. If Congress made a law to throw players in jail who kneeled during the national anthem it would violate the United States Constitution. But, while the First Amendment protects them from being sent to jail, they could still be fired from the NFL. By this point, however, it would be†¦show more content†¦This article talks about Venezuela’s President Nicolà ¡s Maduro wanting to rewrite the country’s constitution, originally written in 1999. The exact changes that would be made to the document are not known, but citizens and leaders of both Venezuela and the United States, including President Trump, believe it will make the government too much like Cuba’s. Cuba has a communist government that controls everything. There will be a vote that many people plan on boycotting, and there have been many protests from all the people wh o do not want the President of Venezuela to go through with the changes. These strikes are dangerous and have ended up killing many people. The Twenty-Sixth Amendment of the Constitution reduces the voting age to eighteen years old. It says that a citizen who is eighteen or older cannot be denied the ability to vote by any state because of their age. Until this, in most states, citizens had to be twenty-one years old to vote. The article and this amendment connect in certain ways. Many Venezuelans do not like their President’s plan to make changes to their country’s constitution. If something like this were to happen in the United States, and citizens were angry at the idea, the people’s voice would need to be heard. With the voting age at eighteen years old, more people could vote against the plan to show the government just how many citizens disagree with making changes to theShow MoreRelatedThe Pros And Cons Of Mass Shootings772 Words   |  4 Pagesof October, there have been 350 mass shootings in the United States in 2017 alone. With data from the Mass shooter tracker, it shows that from 2013-2017 2,592 people were killed and another 7,305 people were left wounded. The federal Bureau of investigators defines a mass shooting as â€Å"the murdering of four or more people with no ‘cooling off’ period between murders.† Mass shootings are at the center of most d ebates when it comes to cum control laws. A mass shooting can take place anywhere from anRead MoreSchool Shootings Are Becoming More And More Prevalent924 Words   |  4 PagesSchool shootings are defined as being a mass shooting which involves a gun attack on an educational institution. The first known shooting in the United States happened during the 1700s. Four Lenape American Indians entered a schoolhouse near present-day Greencastle, Pennsylvania. The schoolmaster, Enoch Brown, was shot and killed along with several other children in which only two survived. There have been hundreds of shootings since, and more specifically there have been at least 156 school shootingsRead MoreThe Campus Carry Bill Is A Controversial Bill985 Words   |  4 Pagesof age, which obtain a handgun license, will be able to carry a gun on campus. The idea of the campus carry bill is to increase the people’s safety and decrease the number of mass shootings and other cases in the United States. There have been many questions brought up by both sides of the issue; there are many pros and cons on the issue that will go into effect with the campus carry bill. Twenty States in the Unites States have prohibited the law for carrying concealed guns on campus, but many othersRead MoreDon t Pull The Trigger On Gun Control1029 Words   |  5 Pages Don’t Pull the Trigger on Gun control Have you ever wondered why the United States always seems to have mass shootings in the news? Well, this is why gun control should be mandated in the America. Gun control is a debate fueled by the recent shootings of Colombine, Sandy Hook, Marysville Pilchuck, and the recent shooting at a social center. Gun control is a proposal to ban or further restrict gun laws, gun control has been put in place in many other countries such as Canada, The United Kingdom,Read MoreAnnotated Bibliography On The Gun Of The Teeth : The Worldwide Plague Of Small Arms1597 Words   |  7 Pagesfifteen, died in accidental shootings. This proves that there should be stricter gun control laws. Gun Control - ProCon.org. ProConorg Headlines.N.p., n.d. Web. 10 Feb. 2016. Statistics show that five women a day are killed by guns and if there is a gun in a domestic relationship, it increases murder by 500 percent. There are many pros and cons to the gun control laws. Some of the pros are abusers and stalkers, reduce the amount of accidental gun deaths. Some of the cons are: gun control laws wouldRead MoreThe Debate Over The Gun Control892 Words   |  4 Pagesusually gun free zones, but with so many shootings happening on campuses some want to be allowed to carry. A lot of people are for infringing upon a person’s constitutional right to life and liberty and self-protection. They claim it will lead to more shootings. Starting in August, Texas will join seven other states in allowing hand guns on campus (Alford). The people that oppose conceal carry on campus believe this law will just open the door for more shootings on campus. Arguments against concealRead MoreGun Control Is A Problem Essay1282 Words   |  6 PagesImage Getting Guns At Gun Shows PROS CONS According to a Pew Research survey in Mar. 2013, 83% of all the adults surveyed, 79% of gun-owners, 86% of people living with a gun-owner, and 74% of NRA households approve of background checks for private and gun show sales. Guns don t kill people; people kill people. And people need more gun education and mental illness screening to prevent massacres and other shootings .The Sporting Arms and Ammunition ManufacturersRead MoreThe Pros And Cons Of Gun Control875 Words   |  4 Pagesthe number of mass shootings that have occurred in the United States in the last few years the issue of gun control laws has become a prevalent topic of debate throughout American society. This debate stems from two opposing arguments over gun control. Some feel gun control laws are fair and not the contributing factor to these mass shootings, whereas, others feel that there is an urgent need for strict laws in order to end the problem of mass shootings. There are numerous pros and cons to the en forcementRead MoreThe Processing Of Possessing A Gun1383 Words   |  6 PagesEnforcement Officers Protection Act, Firearms Owners Protection Act, Crime Control Act, Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act, Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act, President Obama Proposes Sweeping Changes to Gun Control, Colorado Recalls Pro-Gun Control State Senators are some of the law that has been passed after the second amendment. Violations of gun control laws, such as a straw purchase, usually result in felony charges. A straw purchase is when an actual gun buyer uses another individualRead MoreGun Rights And Gun Control1405 Words   |  6 Pagesshould be regulated we have many arguments for the pros and cons of both sides. Gun control is now one of the most talked about subject in the country due to the vast amount of mass murders and school shootings that have been taken place in recent years. However, even with all this gun violence taken place it seems to have only made people ta ke more stubborn stance on their opinion of how the gun laws should be handled. With one faction called the pro-gun control sided standing in the position of stricter

The Characters’ Conformation to Social Restrictions in the stories The Gilded Six-Bits and The Waltz Free Essays

In the stories The Gilded Six-Bits by Zora Neale Hurtson and The Waltz, by Dorothy Parker, the main characters find themselves acting under the tight social constraints that society projects on them. Their gender, race and class all dictate how they see themselves and how others see them, and therefore how they must act. Missie May, Joe and the narrator of The Waltz are all puppets to convention, although not always conscious of it. We will write a custom essay sample on The Characters’ Conformation to Social Restrictions in the stories The Gilded Six-Bits and The Waltz or any similar topic only for you Order Now Through this essay I will demonstrate the social restrictions and rules that existed for people of color and women in the early 1900s, with evidence from the text. The Gilded Six-Bits is a moving story of frustration and greed. In the home of a poor young black couple in the southern states is where our scene takes place. As we find out, Missie May is an attractive black newly married homemaker who takes pride in her husband’s hard work and in her own work around the house. Her husband who works at a fertilizer company adores her, and puts her on a pedestal and yet expects her to stay in her role as a subservient homemaker. As is demonstrated in the story, Missie May struggles with her social restrictions and expectations. Firstly, the color of her skin decrees of what class she is. She is of color, meaning she is lower than even the lowest white folk and also dictates what part of town she must live, at what level she must marry, and where she is to work, but most importantly, it defines how other (white) people treat her. Not only is Missie May black, but also a woman. This puts her at a double disadvantage, since even white women were still struggling to be recognized as valued human beings at this time. White women were just achieving the vote and had just finished proving to the world that they were valuable commodities, during the First World War, when they were made to do men’s jobs to keep society going. Opinion of women at this time is very low. Women’s main role was still to marry and have children. In The Gilded Six -Bits, the first example of role playing is during Missie and Joe’s little game. Every Saturday Joe throws silver dollars onto the floor where Missie stands, and then she must catch him and go through his pockets to find the coveted candy kisses. This is a fun routine they go through every week when Joe is paid, and both parties look forward to it. Missie May goes through the motions of the game: â€Å"Nobody ain’t gointer be chunkin’ money at me and Ah not do ’em nothin’,† she shouted in mock anger.† (p. 1439) Hence, the first role Missie plays is as a predator in a friendly game with her husband. Although society doesn’t impose what she is supposed to do in that instance, it is her husband’s expectations that are imposed on her. Joe insists on playing this game every week, and therefore she must play her character with him every time. Although it is ‘just a game’, it is very representative of their relationship in that he requires her to take her role as he takes his. Next, we see Missie in her predictable role, as a wife and as a woman. We hear from Joe that â€Å"Woman ain’t go no business in a man’s clothes nohow. Go away.† (p.1440) And later he puts her in her place by denouncing the fact that she is hungry: † ‘You ain’t hongry, sugar,’ Joe contradicted her. Youse jes’ a little empty. Ah’m de one whut’s hongry.† Next, Joe gives Missie an order that insults her since she knows how to do her business: â€Å"Have it on the table when Ah git out de tub.† She resentfully comes back with her declaration that she is indeed an excellent wife: â€Å"Ah’m a real wife, not no dress and breath.† As you can tell, Missie accepts her role as a woman and as a wife, and also accepts her subservient role with her husband. She follows the guide lines he sets for her. An interesting observation is that the rules differ as soon as they enter the home. During their little game, Missie and Joe are equals, but as soon as they set foot in the home setting, Missie becomes servile and Joe becomes demanding. Joe is the hard working husband, who brings home the money and supports his wife. He treats his wife well, and ‘adores’ her and yet expects her to be obsequious. â€Å"Ah’m satisfied de way ah is so long as ah be yo husband, ah don’t keer bout nothing else.† (p.1442). He is proud that she is very attractive and treats her as an object and feels he owns her. â€Å"Ah ain’t never been noewhere and Ah ain’t got nothin but you.† (p.1441) Joe also feels the need to parade Missie around to show off what he’s got: â€Å"Go ‘head on now, honey and put on yo’ clothes. He talkin’ ’bout his pritty womens – Ah want ‘im to see mine.† (p.1442) Another instance of keeping in the role of a lady is when Joe refuses to give Missie a second helping of the tater pone: â€Å"Nope, sweetenin’ is for us men-folks. Y’all pritty lil frail eels don’t need nothin’ lak dis. You too sweet already.† (p.1440) I interpret this to mean he doesn’t want her to take more because it isn’t lady-like to have seconds and he wants her to keep her nice figure so he can show her off. His possessive attitude changes when he catches Missie May in bed with Otis D. Slemmons. His attitude towards her changes immensely. She no longer has ‘marital duties’, but still must maintain the cleaning and cooking. This makes her more of a slave than a wife, because she is supposed to do these things as a wife, but once the intimacy is gone, what is left is the bare bones of being a wife, which is to cook and to clean for the husband. After she is caught in bed with Slemmons, Missie laments her loss of menial duties: â€Å"It was day. Nothing more. Joe wouldn’t be coming home as usual. No need to fling open the front door and sweep off the porch, making it nice for Joe. Never no more breakfast to cook; no more washing and starching of Joe’s jumper-jackets and pants. No more nothing, So why get-up?† (p.1444) I find it very interesting that as soon as her husband finds out about her affair, she mourns not the loss of trust, or ‘good times’, but she mourns the work that she did for him. She laments that she can no longer serve him the way she used to. Missie May took her role as being a wife very seriously and when she thought there was no need for her ‘services’ anymore, she decided there wasn’t much to live for, which is quite shocking. Missie May was so involved in her role with her husband, that she had no other identity. â€Å"He had both chance and time to kill the intruder in his helpless condition – half in and half out of his pants – but he was too weak to take action. The shapeless enemies of humanity that live in the hours of Time had waylaid Joe. He was assaulted in his weakness. Like Sampson awakening after his haircut. So he just opened his mouth and laughed.† (p.1143) This last scene describes a time when Joe does not know how to act or what to do. There is not a specific protocol for poor blacks or rich whites of what to do when one catches one’s wife cheating. He is not sure what he feels or whether to laugh or cry. He is not clear as to what his role in this situation is. Does he kill the intruder? Does he beat his wife? Joe is caught in a brutally complicated situation, where society has no specific guidelines to follow. Fortunately, Joe, being the good soul he is, hits Slemmons, and comforts his wife, not following convention in the least with those actions. The narrator in The Waltz by Dorothy Parker takes a humorous look at women’s etiquette in society. The Waltz is about a woman who is trapped in the conventions of her high class society. She must conform to the ‘rules’ of her status. In this case, she is asked to dance by a man whom she detests and does not want to waltz with. For pages, she condemns the man with whom she dances while outwardly ‘enjoying’ herself. The narrator (whom we shall refer to as Mary) ironically points out how women are supposed to be passive and receptive to men. The rules of convention dictate that she must not only dance with him, but forgive his clumsiness and invite him to continue dancing with her, all the while, inside damning his every word and motion. â€Å"There was I, trapped. Trapped like a trap in a trap.† (p.1463) Although Missie May and ‘Mary’ differ greatly in their social class and their race, they share a common bond of both being women in the early 1900s. Here we have Missie May, at the very bottom of the social totem pole, being a black woman, and then we have Mary, who is of the highest social ranking, and incredibly, both suffer from the constraints of society. In the next quotation, we see the two facedness of Mary; the contradiction between her thoughts and her actual speech: â€Å"Ow! For God’s sake, don’t kick, you idiot; this is only second down. Oh, my shin. My poor, poor shin, that I’ve had ever since I was a little girl! ‘Oh, no, no, no. Goodness, no. It didn’t hurt the least little bit. And anyway it was my fault. Really it was. Truly. Well, you’re just being sweet, to say that. It really was all my fault.’ Die he must and die he shall, for what he did to me. I don’t want to be the over-sensitive type, but you can’t tell me that kick was unpremeditated†¦but when it comes to kicking, I am Outraged Womanhood. When you kick me in the shin, smile.† (p.1463) Mary apologizes profusely, and is always saving the man’s embarrassment, always cradling the man’s ego. This high-class woman is expected to stay mute about her opinions and stoop to pleasing the man. Even though she is not serving a man directly as Missie May serves Joe, Mary is in a sense serving under male society’s laws. She serves men by not outwitting them, by not broadcasting her opinions and by ‘smiling’. Mary is just as servile as Missie May in that she obeys a man based society. The three characters discussed in this essay, from The Gilded Six-Bits and The Waltz, all deal with the challenges of their roles in society differently. Missie May accepts her role graciously, until she lashes out and has an affair, Joe gets caught in a moment when he does not know what to do, and therefore laughs, and ‘Mary’ talks to herself, but never exposes her inner thoughts. No matter the class, race or gender they all found ways to cope with the roles society had imposed on them. How to cite The Characters’ Conformation to Social Restrictions in the stories The Gilded Six-Bits and The Waltz, Papers

Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission †MyAssignmenthelp

Question: Discuss about the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission. Answer: Introduction: Garriock v Football Federation Australia[1]is amongst the recent cases of Australia which saw a claim of unlawful discrimination being brought forward by a female football player in the New South Wales Civil and Administrative Tribunal where the Tribunal held that the discrimination which had been alleged by the plaintiff was not a condition or requirement based on the anti discriminatory act of NSW. In this case, the plaintiff was Heather Garriock and the defendant was the Football Federation Australia. Heather had represented Australia in three world cups and two Olympics[2]. The plaintiff was a former Matilda, Olympian and a football player and was also the mother of Kaizen, a three year old child. She raised a complaint against the Federation for rejecting the request which she had made regarding her the costs of her child for the period during which she would be on the tour in USA, while she was offered a spot on the 3-week football tour. It was stated by Heather that the standa rd pay for the Federation in the matter of the previous tour was almost half of the child care costs of her daughter[3]. Through this tour of USA, Heather was to get an overall sum of $2,440 which included a pay of $500 for every game and a paid allowance of $1500 for the two week tour[4]. The claims made by the plaintiff were related to the conduct of the Federation regarding the indirect discrimination against her, which led to the provisions of the Anti-Discrimination Act, 1997[5] having being breached. The basis of this allegation was over the unlawfulness of the discrimination against an employee by the employer relating to the responsibility as a carer[6]. She based her claim on section 49V of the Anti-Discrimination Act for the responsibility as carer in context of employment. The key issue raised in this case by Heather was in the matter of identifying the requirements or condition related to the requirements placed before Heather by the Federation and which had to be fulfilled. The reason for this was that an indirect discrimination claim had a crucial component of indentifying a requirement or a condition. The unlawful conduct of the Federation was related to imposing the requirement or condition which was brought forward for a player in the matter of fulfilling the same, in comparison to the other players, and this was an unreasonable thing. The players were required to take the full responsibility in this case for the alterative carer arrangements for their children during the tour and also for the costs associated with it. The alternative requirement required the players to undergo the tour in which the full responsibility regarding the substitute maternal care arrangements for the child had to be borne by the player and also for the costs associated with it[7]. What was argued on behalf of Heather Garriock? And why? It was argued on behalf of Heather that the conduct of the defendant had been a direct contravention of section 49V (1) (c), 49V (2) (a) and 49V (2) (d) of the Anti-Discrimination Act due to the discrimination against her for the responsibilities as a carer in the terms of the tour which had been offered, as she was discriminated in the matter of condition of employer which the employer affords and also for the detriment of the employee. Another claim made by the plaintiff was that she was an employee of the Federation which made the pertinent sections apply on her. Though, this claim was denied by the Federation. This issue was not disputed as the provisions of section 49V applied on the people working under a contract and this was not contested by the defendant as the plaintiff was working based on a contract[8]. Heather also claimed an indirect discrimination based on section 49T (1) (b) of the Anti-Discrimination Act. It was claimed that there had been indirect discrimination on the basis of the obligations which the plaintiff held as carer since she had to obey the requirements put by the Federation, which was an unreasonable thing to do. The requirement related to the responsibility of the costs associated with the care of her daughter being imposed on her during the tour of USA. In the matter of the claims of the Federation, she rejected that the impugned were applicable on her[9]. In this regard, she highlighted Freemes testimony in the matter of applicability of these requirements as a general rule which applied on every player who took part in the US tour[10]. She made reference to the case of Hurst v State of Queensland[11] for the claim of the Federation and stated that she was the only one who had to deal with the requirements as they only applied on her. What was argued on behalf of the Football Federation of Australia? And why? The argument presented by the Federation was that the conduct which the plaintiff had claimed in this case was not covered under the sections she quoted. It was also provided that these impugned requirements had not been posed over the plaintiff at any stage and for this reference was made to the time when the plaintiff was hired and the duration of the tour in which she was engaged. This was also not a pre-requisite for the selection as member of Matilda. The argument made by the Federation provided that the full complaint had been conceived in a wrong manner since the requirement and alternative requirements were not required to be followed by Heather or by any player who was on the tour to USA. As per the defendant, they were not required to bring the child of the plaintiff on the tour or to bear the costs of bringing her to the tour. This decision was to be adhered to on the tour for the relatives and for the dependent children as this was a personal issue and was not in any mann er related to the conditions on which the players had been selected for the tour. Another point argued by the Federation was the unfairness of characterising the denial for accommodating the demands of the plaintiff for bearing the costs related to the child on tour, in the matter of the provisions of requirement covered in section 49T(1)(b) of the Anti-Discrimination Act[12]. The Federation also contended that despite the notion of Heather where the defendant was required to pay for the costs of child required as their responsibility, she had failed in showing that an industrial legislation or contract required the Federation to contribute to the costs of child care, which was an addition costs, and which she would be bearing during the said US tour. It was also stated by the defendant that there was a shortage of evidence which could be sufficient to show that the requirement had been placed on the players for fulfilling the impugned requirements. The reason for this was the plaintiff being the only person on this tour who was not affiliated to the Matildas playing contract and was the only person who had the responsibilities as a carer for a small child. The impugned requirements had also been stated in such manner that they were applicable only for the plaintiff[13]. And this was a key issue in the claims made by the plaintiff for the requirement to be fulfilled by the entire group, based on Australian Iron and Steel Pty Limited v Banovic[14]. What did the Tribunal decide? And why? The application made by the plaintiff was rejected by the tribunal in this case due to the impugned requirements not being the requirements as per the sections quoted by the plaintiff. The Tribunal went on to show that in order to form this as a requirement or a condition based on the provisions of the Anti-Discrimination Act, the employer was under a duty regarding the requirement having been applicable on every employee and not just on the plaintiff. This was based on the fact that the provisions of the act in the matter of indirect discrimination, in which the decision making party is under the obligation of deciding upon the major high proportion of a person in absence of a related feature for either complying with or being able to comply with the requirements, as compared to the person having the required characteristics[15]. For the present case it was held by the Tribunal that Heather was the only person who was required to adhere to the requirement or the alternative requirement. The remaining players on this US based tour were not under any carer responsibilities for a child and also, none of the other players had a child with them. So, based on this, the Tribunal was of the view that it could not be shown that the other players, without the carer responsibilities, had the duty for alternative carer arrangement for the period of the tour or for the costs which had to be born for doing the same. The Tribunal expressed their view that the Federation would possibly have to face a lot of criticism in the matter of this issue where the same is considered as a mean spirited thing and also presents the inflexible attitude of the Federation towards its players, based on the view of the plaintiff. However, the statute applicable here did not cover the remedy for all kinds of discrimination[16]. A comparison was drawn by the Tribunal of this case to the case of Hurst and Devlin v Education Queensland[17] which was related to the young student with hearing impairment. In this case, the students were under an obligation regarding accepting of the education and getting the instructions in English without the help of Auslan teacher or any interpreter. In this case, the plaintiff was the only student in the entire class who had these characterises which gave rise to a claim of discrimination due to his hearing impairment. The negative impact of this obligation was based on Hurt and also on all of the other students in that classroom, even when they faced no problem in conforming to these conditions. This case and the case of Heather had difference in the sense that the applicable condition of the Hurst v State of Queensland case had to be obeyed by all the students[18]. In the matter of the emails which had been exchanged between Freeme and the plaintiff, specifically in the matter of the statement made by Freeme for the same not being an obligation of the employer to pay for the costs of the child care, apart from the admission made in oral evidence regarding the simple reliance on the defendants position for a person who wanted to bring their children on the tour, to bear the costs of the children brought with them. This was enough to show that the defendant had not singled out the plaintiff and that the plaintiff had only been subjected to a common rule which was applicable on all the players. For deciding on the matter of the plaintiff being engaged in the playing contract of Matildas, a comparison was drawn to the case of Bonella Ors v Wollongong City Council[19] for identifying the base group. The composition of a group is not covered in the provisions of the Anti-Discrimination act and they have to be changed based on the particular situatio n of the relevant case. Based on the case of Commonwealth Bank v Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission[20] it had to be shown that the significance of the pertinent features for complying with the impugned requirements. Having being engaged in the different terms as a contrast to the other players, it could not be shown how the touring team formed an improper based group, on which the requirements could be applied in an equal manner. Thus, the claim of the plaintiff on the basis of Hurst v State of Queensland could not relate to the problem which had been highlighted[21]. In the end, the Tribunal concluded that if it gave the verdict of an unlawful discrimination against the defendant, the defendant would be unnecessarily put in a strained position, even when it adopted the most liberal interpretation of the provisions of the NSW Anti-Discrimination Act. Hence, they rejected the complaint of the plaintiff made against the defendant. Bibliography Australian Iron and Steel Pty Limited v Banovic [1989] HCA 56; (1989) 168 CLR 165 Bonella Ors v Wollongong City Council [2001] NSWADT 194 Commonwealth Bank v Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (1997) 150 ALR 1 Garriock v Football Federation Australia [2016] NSWCATAD 63 Hurst and Devlin v Education Queensland [2005] FCA 405 Hurst v State of Queensland [2006] FCAFC 100 Anti-Discrimination Board of NSW, Matildas childcare case fails (May 2016) https://www.antidiscrimination.justice.nsw.gov.au/Pages/legal-cases/matildas-childcare-case-fails.aspx Maddocks, 2016 In Review (2016) https://www.maddocks.com.au/app/uploads/2014/10/Maddocks-Employment-Safety-People-2016-In-Review.pdf New South Wales Case Law, Garriock v Football Federation Australia [2016] NSWCATAD 63 (2016) https://www.caselaw.nsw.gov.au/decision/5705a150e4b05f2c4f04c9c6 PCC Lawyers, Unlawful discrimination: Garriock v Football Federation Australia [2016] NSWCATAD 63 (2016) https://www.pcclawyers.com.au/news-centre/recent-law-cases/277-garriock-v-football-federation-australia-2016-nswcatad-63 RobertsonHayles, Indirect Discrimination (25 May 2016) https://www.robertsonhayles.com.au/indirect-discrimination/ Young J, Even Matildas Need Childcare: an Analysis of Garriock V Football Federation Australia (8 August 2016) https://www.corrs.com.au/publications/corrs-in-brief/even-matildas-need-childcare-an-analysis-of-garriock-v-football-federation-australia/